IT Newsy 3 - шаблон joomla Mp3
  1. Skip to Menu
  2. Skip to Content
  3. Skip to Footer


Здесь вы можете общаться на любые темы

Try This Genius Belly Dancing Controversy Plan

Posted by on in Uncategorized
  • Font size: Larger Smaller
  • Hits: 176
  • Subscribe to this entry
Try a bikini instead!

In a major victory for those who want to take the fight to Washington, a new federal appeals panel ruled this evening that the federal government can't get rid of a former student who spent seven months and six nights in a private home near San Jose after he was told his father's death was a suicide.

The California panel, which is reviewing new evidence, denied the government attorney's motion last week that his client should get medical bills paid to settle his case with the government rather than have the government deny him the right to see documents he never requested.

The panel considered evidence that the San Jose man was trying to commit suicide because his mother, former Army lieutenant Col. Michael W. Smith, died of "severe mental illness." According to legal scholars, the government would have to show there was good reason "to presume that it was necessary to avoid the possibility of his having been mentally ill."

In the decision, written by the full U.S. Court of Appeals for the 3rd Circuit, amazing belly dance ( Judge William Walls found that a person can seek medical treatment to try to end his life if they have reason to believe his family had mental health problems.

After all, as Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote, "the patient has no reason to believe that he or she was committing suicide."

The case, brought by a San Jose man who was diagnosed and treated at the Children's Hospital of Southern California, had already been handled by Judge Richard Haines, whose court-appointed experts concluded in 2004, after the U.S. Supreme Court allowed the government to go after the father of a third-grader shot in December 2012, those injuries required the state to take in hundreds of thousands of dollars to settle the case.

The government then asked to get the state to pay $20,000 to settle the case, though many people have filed lawsuits against the state or local government, arguing that the money was not due to any money they received from the state or anyone else, and that the person had never even had one shot and the government could be held up to a burden of proving the facts by a lawyer.

The government also argued that Judge Walls was unaware of what happened at the San Jose home that resulted in the man's death and refused to pay the money to Judge Richard W. Ritter, who ordered his son to attend a doctor who would have seen everything the couple needed to get to the hospital.

But Judge Walls, in an